The word "review" comes from chess — after a game, both players replay the moves and examine what worked and what didn't. A relationship review works the same way: it's not about regret or self-blame. It's about returning to what happened and extracting what you can take forward.
GAME is an acronym that doubles as a process: Gather facts, Analyze signals, Map paths, Evaluate the review. Each step is simple, but doing all four will reveal patterns you never noticed.
Take out a notebook (or open your recording tool) and write down your most recent emotionally charged interaction. Don't analyze anything yet — just record objective facts. Who said what? When and where? What was the other person's facial expression? What was your own reaction? Write like a journalist: observe, don't comment.
Now look at what you wrote and ask: Which things did the other person express explicitly? Which things did you infer from their behavior? What information is uncertain? Mark the uncertain parts as "unknown." This step's key is honestly admitting what you don't know.
Based on your facts and analysis, sketch out a few possible paths forward. If they clearly showed interest, what's your next move? If the information is still ambiguous, what else do you need to find out? If there's a clear rejection or boundary, what's your path? Write at least two paths — including the option of doing nothing.
Come back a week or a month later. Which of your guesses were confirmed? Which were disproven? What did your chosen path produce? What did you learn about yourself? The value of a review isn't in the day you write it — it's in the patterns you discover when you revisit.